<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.gurblogs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>GurBlogs - vista</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Uhhh, Remind Me...</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...Not to hire &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.piercemattie.com/&quot;&gt;this PR firm&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I kid you not - here&amp;#39;s their take on how bloggers should have handled the Edelman/Microsoft Vista laptop-gate:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bloggers&lt;/strong&gt;: Be professional and human, don’t crucify a company for deeming you worthy of free products to review and own! You might want to mention professional reviews of technology are &amp;quot;loaned&amp;quot; products like MP3 players, TV&amp;#39;s and electronics. They don’t get to keep them... they essentially are &amp;quot;on a tour&amp;quot; following the tech press circuit, like a rock-star. Honestly, if you’re a Blogger and you get to keep a product like that, the human thing to do is say thank you. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/60">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/101">lost remote</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/102">pierce mattie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/100">steve safran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90">vista</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Asking the Question: Does Quality Matter?</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, given that Edelman has such &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;a commanding presence online&lt;/a&gt;, I decided to start asking some folks who&amp;#39;ve written on the Microsoft Vista laptop-gate a simple question:  how do you think Edelman&amp;#39;s PR stunt with Microsoft affected the quality of Edelman&amp;#39;s mindshare online?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First up, &lt;a href=&quot;http://andylark.blogs.com/&quot;&gt;Andy Lark&lt;/a&gt;, who recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://andylark.blogs.com/andylark/2007/01/wrong_move_by_m.html&quot;&gt;placed blame squarely on Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure that Edelman had anything to do with the current Microsoft stunt although they&amp;#39;ve definitely been associated with it. This is a classic case of extending traditional PR tactics into the blogosphere. A very wrong move.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/84">andy lark</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/86">micropersuasion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/85">steve rubel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90">vista</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
