<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.gurblogs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>GurBlogs - scandal</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Turns Out, No Need To Reinvent The Wheel...</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...So says Kami Watson Huyse of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://overtonecomm.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Commmunications Overtones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  She also recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://overtonecomm.blogspot.com/2007/01/microsoftedelman-blogger-outreach.html&quot;&gt;cracked on Edelman and Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; for their handling of laptop-gate, concluding:  I wonder if there will be as visible coverage of the Vista operating system as there was about the evaluation computers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, I decided to pose &lt;a href=&quot;/node/108&quot;&gt;the same question&lt;/a&gt; to her: how do you think Edelman&amp;#39;s PR stunt with Microsoft affected the quality of  &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;Edelman&amp;#39;s mindshare online&lt;/a&gt;?  And here&amp;#39;s what she had to say:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your question and some comments on my post about the Microsoft gift, got me to wondering how media companies, whose business it is to review items, handle this situation. I turned to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnetnetworks.com/editorial/disclosure.html&quot;&gt;the guidelines set forth by C|Net&lt;/a&gt;, one of the best-known tech review companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/91">cnet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/93">communications overtones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/92">kami watson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/83">public relations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/94">vist</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Asking the Question: Does Quality Matter?</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, given that Edelman has such &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;a commanding presence online&lt;/a&gt;, I decided to start asking some folks who&amp;#39;ve written on the Microsoft Vista laptop-gate a simple question:  how do you think Edelman&amp;#39;s PR stunt with Microsoft affected the quality of Edelman&amp;#39;s mindshare online?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First up, &lt;a href=&quot;http://andylark.blogs.com/&quot;&gt;Andy Lark&lt;/a&gt;, who recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://andylark.blogs.com/andylark/2007/01/wrong_move_by_m.html&quot;&gt;placed blame squarely on Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure that Edelman had anything to do with the current Microsoft stunt although they&amp;#39;ve definitely been associated with it. This is a classic case of extending traditional PR tactics into the blogosphere. A very wrong move.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/84">andy lark</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/86">micropersuasion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/85">steve rubel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90">vista</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
