<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.gurblogs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>GurBlogs - microsoft</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Across the Internets</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/191</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Google Operating System, &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/03/why-people-link-to-wikipedia.html&quot;&gt;Linki Go Wiki&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Google Operating System, &lt;a href=&quot;http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2007/03/google-by-sms.html&quot;&gt;Google Txt&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Tech Crunch, &lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Techcrunch/~3/104620292/&quot;&gt;Cranky&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Recovering Journalist, &lt;a href=&quot;http://recoveringjournalist.typepad.com/recovering_journalist/2007/03/whistling_past_.html&quot;&gt;Irrational Exurberance&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://recoveringjournalist.typepad.com/recovering_journalist/2007/03/whistling_past_.html&quot;&gt;&lt;/a&gt;Scobleizer, &lt;a href=&quot;http://scobleizer.com/2007/03/16/microsoft-tells-mvps-were-in-it-to-win-really/&quot;&gt;Microsoft is Suck-e&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/191#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/58">across the internets</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/325">crank calls</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/168">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/3">mainstream media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/5">newspapers</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/110">tech crunch</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 20:33:58 -0700</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">191 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Google-ing for Microsoft</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/150</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Since I long ago dropped the entirety of Microsoft Office - and made my way over to Google Docs &amp;amp; Spreadsheets - I was psyched to come across this lil&amp;#39; tidbit from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.readwriteweb.com&quot;&gt;Read/Write Web&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Whenever those of you who use Gmail receive a spreadsheet or a document in an email, you will see a new link next to the &amp;quot;Download&amp;quot; link that says &amp;quot;Open as a Google document.&amp;quot; Click on that and the attachment will automatically be imported into Docs &amp;amp; Spreadsheets and added to your personal document list where you can make changes, invite collaborators and search for it later.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/images/gmail_googleds.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Got one word for you: BINGO!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/readwriteweb/~3/84382828/google_gmail_docs_and_spreadsheets_integration.php&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;(more)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/150&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/150#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/219">docs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/168">google</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/220">spreadsheets</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:01:02 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">150 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Uhhh, Remind Me...</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...Not to hire &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.piercemattie.com/&quot;&gt;this PR firm&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I kid you not - here&amp;#39;s their take on how bloggers should have handled the Edelman/Microsoft Vista laptop-gate:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bloggers&lt;/strong&gt;: Be professional and human, don’t crucify a company for deeming you worthy of free products to review and own! You might want to mention professional reviews of technology are &amp;quot;loaned&amp;quot; products like MP3 players, TV&amp;#39;s and electronics. They don’t get to keep them... they essentially are &amp;quot;on a tour&amp;quot; following the tech press circuit, like a rock-star. Honestly, if you’re a Blogger and you get to keep a product like that, the human thing to do is say thank you. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/60">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/101">lost remote</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/102">pierce mattie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/100">steve safran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90">vista</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Turns Out, No Need To Reinvent The Wheel...</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...So says Kami Watson Huyse of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://overtonecomm.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Commmunications Overtones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  She also recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://overtonecomm.blogspot.com/2007/01/microsoftedelman-blogger-outreach.html&quot;&gt;cracked on Edelman and Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; for their handling of laptop-gate, concluding:  I wonder if there will be as visible coverage of the Vista operating system as there was about the evaluation computers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, I decided to pose &lt;a href=&quot;/node/108&quot;&gt;the same question&lt;/a&gt; to her: how do you think Edelman&amp;#39;s PR stunt with Microsoft affected the quality of  &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;Edelman&amp;#39;s mindshare online&lt;/a&gt;?  And here&amp;#39;s what she had to say:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your question and some comments on my post about the Microsoft gift, got me to wondering how media companies, whose business it is to review items, handle this situation. I turned to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnetnetworks.com/editorial/disclosure.html&quot;&gt;the guidelines set forth by C|Net&lt;/a&gt;, one of the best-known tech review companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/91">cnet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/93">communications overtones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/92">kami watson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/83">public relations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/94">vist</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Asking the Question: Does Quality Matter?</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, given that Edelman has such &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;a commanding presence online&lt;/a&gt;, I decided to start asking some folks who&amp;#39;ve written on the Microsoft Vista laptop-gate a simple question:  how do you think Edelman&amp;#39;s PR stunt with Microsoft affected the quality of Edelman&amp;#39;s mindshare online?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;First up, &lt;a href=&quot;http://andylark.blogs.com/&quot;&gt;Andy Lark&lt;/a&gt;, who recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://andylark.blogs.com/andylark/2007/01/wrong_move_by_m.html&quot;&gt;placed blame squarely on Microsoft&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I&amp;#39;m not sure that Edelman had anything to do with the current Microsoft stunt although they&amp;#39;ve definitely been associated with it. This is a classic case of extending traditional PR tactics into the blogosphere. A very wrong move.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/108#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/84">andy lark</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/86">micropersuasion</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/85">steve rubel</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90">vista</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 10:54:40 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">108 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
