<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.gurblogs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>GurBlogs - edelman</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Clues for $1.99</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/124</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Two things I found amusing about Edelman&amp;#39;s newly released &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edelman.com/insights/&quot;&gt;&amp;quot;Corporate Guide to the Global Blogosphere&amp;quot;&lt;/a&gt; report:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;1.  That the report is only available in pdf and some other hard to link, non-web-searchable version.  Honestly, I wanted to shoot myself reading it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;2.  This quote:  &amp;quot;We are convinced that by engaging the blogosphere in a transparent manner, companies can have their viewpoints heard.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;#39;t know ... visions of &lt;a href=&quot;http://blog.holtz.com/index.php/weblog/edelman_and_the_one_sided_conversation/&quot;&gt;&lt;em&gt;Walmarting Across America&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/a&gt; come to mind?!?!?!?!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/124&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/124#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/60">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/148">blogs</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/146">communications</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/147">corporate</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/149">insight</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/145">linking</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:52:17 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">124 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ruling the PR Channel</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/119</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;So, last week &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;we looked at some of the top PR firms&lt;/a&gt;, to see how much &lt;a href=&quot;/node/100&quot;&gt;mindshare&lt;/a&gt; they each generated online.  Coincidentally, &lt;a href=&quot;http://strumpette.com/archives/277-Alexa-Web-Rankings-Chapel-Tops-PRs-A-List.html&quot;&gt;Strumpette just published&lt;/a&gt; the Alexa rankings of some top PR sites - a ranking we thought we&amp;#39;d amp up a bit.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;/node/100&quot;&gt;Our mindshare calculation&lt;/a&gt; includes Alexa, but also includes Technorati and Google Page Rank (which, many would argue, provide even more reliable measurement of relevancy online).  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The results have been superimposed on &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;last week&amp;#39;s rankings&lt;/a&gt; - and the new line-up follows:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align=&quot;center&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/images/PRStats.JPG&quot; alt=&quot;&quot; /&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/119&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/119#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/124">chris abraham</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/126">josh hallett</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/123">neville hobson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/127">scott baradell</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/128">strumpette</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/125">todd defren</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 09 Jan 2007 12:28:49 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">119 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Uhhh, Remind Me...</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...Not to hire &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.piercemattie.com/&quot;&gt;this PR firm&lt;/a&gt;.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I kid you not - here&amp;#39;s their take on how bloggers should have handled the Edelman/Microsoft Vista laptop-gate:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bloggers&lt;/strong&gt;: Be professional and human, don’t crucify a company for deeming you worthy of free products to review and own! You might want to mention professional reviews of technology are &amp;quot;loaned&amp;quot; products like MP3 players, TV&amp;#39;s and electronics. They don’t get to keep them... they essentially are &amp;quot;on a tour&amp;quot; following the tech press circuit, like a rock-star. Honestly, if you’re a Blogger and you get to keep a product like that, the human thing to do is say thank you. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/112#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/60">blogging</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/101">lost remote</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/102">pierce mattie</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/100">steve safran</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/90">vista</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jan 2007 08:23:33 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">112 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>When All Else Fails, Flog?</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/111</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;David Henderson of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.makingnews.typepad.com/&quot;&gt;Making News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt; expresses this concern in response to the same question I asked &lt;a href=&quot;/node/108&quot;&gt;him&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;/node/110&quot;&gt;her&lt;/a&gt;: that when &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.edelman.com&quot;&gt;a major PR firm&lt;/a&gt; decides &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.walmart.com&quot;&gt;their client&lt;/a&gt; is better off flogging - er, fake blogging - chances are, the state of the firm&amp;#39;s media relations is verging on piss poor (my words, not his).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His exact words follow:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;I think we need to be cautious of turning meaningful marketing terms, like Mindshare, into the latest PR pop-hype.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/111&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/111#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/97">david henderson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/96">flog</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/99">mainstream</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/98">making news</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/83">public relations</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 22:43:30 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">111 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Turns Out, No Need To Reinvent The Wheel...</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;...So says Kami Watson Huyse of &lt;em&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://overtonecomm.blogspot.com/&quot;&gt;Commmunications Overtones&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;.  She also recently &lt;a href=&quot;http://overtonecomm.blogspot.com/2007/01/microsoftedelman-blogger-outreach.html&quot;&gt;cracked on Edelman and Microsoft&lt;/a&gt; for their handling of laptop-gate, concluding:  I wonder if there will be as visible coverage of the Vista operating system as there was about the evaluation computers?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, I decided to pose &lt;a href=&quot;/node/108&quot;&gt;the same question&lt;/a&gt; to her: how do you think Edelman&amp;#39;s PR stunt with Microsoft affected the quality of  &lt;a href=&quot;/node/103&quot;&gt;Edelman&amp;#39;s mindshare online&lt;/a&gt;?  And here&amp;#39;s what she had to say:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Your question and some comments on my post about the Microsoft gift, got me to wondering how media companies, whose business it is to review items, handle this situation. I turned to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnetnetworks.com/editorial/disclosure.html&quot;&gt;the guidelines set forth by C|Net&lt;/a&gt;, one of the best-known tech review companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/110#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/91">cnet</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/93">communications overtones</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/64">edelman</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/92">kami watson</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/81">microsoft</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/63">pr</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/83">public relations</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/82">scandal</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/94">vist</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 04 Jan 2007 14:35:29 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">110 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
