<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://www.gurblogs.com" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>GurBlogs - time magazine</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/48/0</link>
 <description></description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Meet A Critic</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/92</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;In an effort to further the scrutiny of our &lt;a href=&quot;/node/80&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;mindshare calculation&lt;/a&gt;, thought I&amp;#39;d give some ink to a critic - who recently left a comment responding to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gur-tsabar/for-the-love-of-you_b_36586.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;this piece&lt;/a&gt; I had written in the &lt;em&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/em&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Said Thorn:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&amp;quot;This &amp;quot;Mindshare&amp;quot; calculation doesn&amp;#39;t equal real media clout.&lt;br /&gt;Do you see TIME magazine obsessing about the Huffington Post?&lt;br /&gt;That said, TIME&amp;#39;s choice of &amp;quot;You&amp;quot; is indeed an embarrassing cop-out.&amp;quot;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(my response after the jump)&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/92&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/92#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/46">criticism</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/48">time magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 20 Dec 2006 13:28:43 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">92 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>For the Love of You</title>
 <link>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/90</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;(as posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.huffingtonpost.com/gur-tsabar/for-the-love-of-you_b_36586.html&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot;&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/a&gt;)&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Don&amp;#39;t mean to rain on your parade, but &lt;em&gt;Time&lt;/em&gt; magazine is really &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1569514,00.html?aid=434&amp;amp;from=o&amp;amp;to=http%3A//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0%2C9171%2C1569514%2C00.html&quot;&gt;not that into YOU&lt;/a&gt; - they&amp;#39;re into YOUr buying their magazine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reality is, YOU&amp;#39;re threatening its existence. Or I guess, as &lt;em&gt;Time&lt;/em&gt;&amp;#39;s editors call it, &amp;quot;beating the pros at their own game...&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gurblogs.com/node/90&quot;&gt;read more&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
 <comments>http://www.gurblogs.com/node/90#comment</comments>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/42">magazines</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/3">mainstream media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/37">mindshare</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/9">new media</category>
 <category domain="http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/48">time magazine</category>
 <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 07:10:00 -0800</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">90 at http://www.gurblogs.com</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
