http://www.gurblogs.com/taxonomy/term/36/0 en http://www.gurblogs.com/node/186 <p>Strumpette, <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/Strumpette/~3/101407422/330-Funding-for-PR-2.0-to-Dry-Up-in-07.html">A PR Party Pooper</a><br />Lifehacker, <a href="http://lifehacker.com/software/treehugger/ecoliving-the-best-of-treehugger-242041.php">Awakening Your Inner TreeHugger</a><br />Copyblogger, <a href="http://feeds.copyblogger.com/~r/Copyblogger/~3/99389752/">Gramatically Stupid</a><br />Blog Maverick, <a href="http://www.blogmaverick.com/2007/03/13/you-go-viacom/">GooTube Sans Viacom</a><br />The Long Tail, <a href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/TheLongTail/~3/96824945/who_needs_a_cio.html">C-I-Doh!</a> </p> http://www.gurblogs.com/node/186#comment across the internets google pr treehugger viacom youtube Thu, 15 Mar 2007 06:34:25 -0700 admin 186 at http://www.gurblogs.com http://www.gurblogs.com/node/72 <p>Uhh, <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2006/12/08/the-video-startup-that-may-never-launch/" target="_blank">this idea</a> = LAME-O! I&#39;ve got two words (and hyphenated ones, at that) for network tv execs who think <a href="http://www.lostremote.com/2006/12/08/networks-try-to-build-youtube-competitor/" target="_blank">this</a> is the answer to their woes: BUH-BYE! </p> http://www.gurblogs.com/node/72#comment mainstream media networks tv youtube Sat, 09 Dec 2006 11:18:43 -0800 admin 72 at http://www.gurblogs.com